TrainEval – Training for Evaluation in Development, 3rd course in March-July 2009

Date: 10th March, 2008
Venue: Brussels, Belgium

TrainEval is an advanced training programme for evaluation in development, which has been further adapted to the specific requirements of the European development cooperation and the EC evaluation approach. It has successfully been implemented for the first time since February 2008.

The programme has been developed from experienced trainers and evaluators to respond to the increasing demand for evaluation expertise and its professionalization. It is offering a qualification opportunity in development evaluation for consultants, project and evaluation managers of implementing agencies as well as for representatives from financing agencies. Continue reading “TrainEval – Training for Evaluation in Development, 3rd course in March-July 2009”

One World Trust on Accountability of Research Organisations

The Accountability Principles of Research Organisations (APRO) report provides a framework for establishing accountability good practices and principles for policy-oriented research organisations working in developing countries. It discusses how One World Trust’s core principles of accountability – participation, transparency, evaluation and complaints handling – can be applied to research. In addition to providing arguments for both the ethical and instrumental need for accountability to a wide range of stakeholders, it also acknowledges the tensions and challenges that different organisations will face in formulating accountability principles.

By drawing on the experiences of sixteen research organisations, which reflect the diversity of evidence-producers in developing countries, the study identified a series of key processes common to most research organisations. For each process, it illustrates the opportunities that exist for research organisations to apply the principles of accountability to interactions with their stakeholders.

The next stage of the APRO project will be to work with partner research organisations to develop, refine and test the accountability guidelines.”

Consultation Draft: “Better information: better aid” Accra, August 2008 

Produced by aidinfo. aidinfo is an initiative to contribute to faster poverty reduction by making aid more
transparent.

This is a draft for consultation that summarises the evidence we have gathered so far. We welcome suggestions, additions, comments and corrections.
Continue reading “Consultation Draft: “Better information: better aid” Accra, August 2008 “

Ipact at the University of Aberdeen: Course on monitoring and evaluation of maternal and neonatal health programs (in Tanzania)

Date: 17th August to 2nd September, 2009
Venue: Arusha, Tanzania

MS-Training Centre for Development Cooperation in collaboration with Ipact is organising a course in Monitoring and evaluation of maternal and neonatal health programmes 17th August to 2nd September, 2009 – Tanzania

For any further information contact Dr Kasilma Yosh Email: kasilimay@mstcdc.or.tz

Modalities: The registration fee is 3000 USD. It includes the sessions and training material given during the course. Travel, accommodation and food are additional and are to be paid for by the participants. A special session, about Universal access to Reproductive Health, additional objective to MDG5, will be given by an UNFPA senior advisor.

The forms is available on www.ipact-int.com. The number of participants is limited to 25.

Ipact at the University of Aberdeen: Course on monitoring and evaluation of maternal and neonatal health programs (in Burkina Faso)

Date: 2nd -18th February 2009
Venue: GREFSaD et INSSA (Université polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso ), Burkina Faso

GREFSaD et INSSA (Université polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso in collaboration with Ipact is organising a course in Monitoring and evaluation of maternal and neonatal health programmes 2 – 18 February 2009

In French (GREFSaD et INSSA (Université polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso) en collaboration avec Ipact Organisent un cours francophone en Monitoring et Evaluation des Programmes de Santé Maternelle et Néonatale – 2 au 18 Février 2009.

Pour toute information complémentaire, contacter Dr Rasmané Ganaba rganaba.muraz@fasonet.bf
Modalités de règlement: Les frais d’inscription s’élèvent à 3000 USD Ils incluent les prestations et le matériel pédagogique délivré au cours de l’enseignement.

The forms is available on www.ipact-int.com. The number of participants is limited to 25.

Evaluating international advocacy networks

Two papers by Ricardo Wilson-Grau

Evaluating the Effects of International Advocacy Networks, Ricardo Wilson-Grau and Martha Nu. “This “think piece” will first sketch the special challenges of evaluating the effects of the advocacy work of international social change networks. I will then present the approach to evaluating advocacy that I use. This essay is an adaptation of my most recent writing on the broader subject of “Complexity and International Social Change Networks,” which is a chapter in a book by the Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict.These networks almost by definition have an advocacy component, which often is their central activity. Furthermore, my belief is that to a greater or lesser extent, the challenges and the general evaluation methodology I outline in this essay are applicable to almost all social change organisations. I leave that judgement, however, to the reader. ”

This is a paper presented at the Advocacy Impact Evaluation Workshop at the Evans School for Public Affairs, University of Washington, 4-6 December 2007, Seattle, WA, USA, sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. A Spanish version “Evaluación de las redes internacionales de cambio social – Efectos y desafíos de las redes internacionales de incidencia” was published by Futuros 21: http://www.futuros21.infodetalle_articulo.asp?id_articulo=55

Evaluating International Social Change Network: A conceptual framework for a participatory approach”: Ricardo Wilson-Grau, 2007. “International networks for social change are growing in number and infuence.While they need to be able to assess the extent to which they achieve their purpose and determine ways in which to be more effective, conventional evaluation methods are not designed for such complex organisational forms, or for the diverse kinds of activity to which they are characteristically dedicated. Building on an earlier version of their paper, the authors present a set of principles and participatory approaches that are more appropriate to the task of evaluating such networks.”

Published in Development in Practice, Volume 17, Number 2, April 2007

Clear Horizon: Training events in Melbourne

Date: April 2009
Venue: Melbourne, Australia

Participatory Evaluation
2-Apr-2009
A common complaint in monitoring and evaluation…
How to design an evaluation study?
3-Apr-2009
There is a natural tendency when planning …

Clear Horizon: Training events in Melbourne

Date: March 2009
Venue: Melbourne, Australia

People People-Centred Program Logic
16-Mar-2009
Program logic models such as the logical framework do not …
Meaningful Monitoring
18-Mar-2009
In order to make your monitoring meaningful…
Most Significant Change (MSC) Technique
19-Mar-2009
MSC is a powerful tool for monitoring …..

Clear Horizon: Training events in Melbourne and Jogjakarta

Date: February 2009
Venue: Melbourne, Australia, and Jogjakarta, Indonesia

Program Logic for NRM
17-Feb-2009
Program logic is now widely promoted within the NRM sector…
Participatory Performance Story Reporting
19-Feb-2009
The Participatory Performance Story Reporting (PPSR) technique is …
Evaluation Summit Workshop Technique
20-Feb-2009
The second day of Participatory Performance Story Reporting
Most Significant Change Training in Indonesia
23-Feb-2009
MSC is a powerful tool for monitoring…

IMA International training events: Brighton, UK

Date: 12th October 2009
Venue: Brighton, UK.

12th Working with Logframes short course in Brighton, UK, IMA International