Tuesday, August 24th, 2010
HIV-related advocacy evaluation training for civil society organisations.
Produced by the International HIV/AIDS Alliance (Secretariat), International Council of AIDS Service Organizations (ICASO), July 2010, 38 pages. Available as .pdf
"This training pack is published by the Alliance and the International Council of AIDS Service Organizations (ICASO) and consists of two guides designed ...
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment » |
Print This Post
Loading ...
Wednesday, March 31st, 2010
Michael Hammer, Charlotte Rooney, and Shana Warren
ISSN 2043-7943 Briefing paper number 125, March 2010. One World Trust.
"Global and national non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are the most distinct organisational form of civil society, and as such have become increasingly involved and influential in forming public opinion and policy through targeted and professional ...
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments » |
Print This Post
Loading ...
Friday, December 18th, 2009
From the ActionAid website
"Systematization is the reconstruction of and analytical reflection about an experience. Through systematization, events are interpreted in order to understand them… The systematization allows for the experience to be discussed and compared with other similar experiences, and with existing theories and, thus, contributes to an accumulation of ...
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments » |
Print This Post
Loading ...
Friday, December 18th, 2009
Tracking Progress in Advocacy - Why and How to Monitor and Evaluate Advocacy Projects and Programmes looks at the scope of, and rational for, engaging in advocacy work as part of development interventions, then focuses on the monitoring and evaluating of these efforts - offering reasons why and when these ...
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment » |
Print This Post
Loading ...
Wednesday, December 16th, 2009
(email from Pathfinder) Hi Rick. We recently published a new resource for the advocacy evaluation field. Our new guide, Pathfinder : A Practical Guide to Advocacy Evaluation, comes in three editions-one each for advocates, evaluators, and funders. All three editions, plus a bibliography of useful resources, are free to download ...
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments » |
Print This Post
Loading ...
Monday, December 1st, 2008
Two papers by Ricardo Wilson-Grau
Evaluating the Effects of International Advocacy Networks, Ricardo Wilson-Grau and Martha Nu. "This "think piece" will first sketch the special challenges of evaluating the effects of the advocacy work of international social change networks. I will then present the approach to evaluating advocacy that I use. ...
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments » |
Print This Post
Loading ...
Monday, July 21st, 2008
Author: Jane Reisman, Anne Gienapp, and Sarah Stachowiak
Publisher: Organizational Research Services
Publication Date: 2007
Abstract
What are examples of data collection tools for evaluating advocacy?
This handbook of tools is a companion to ORS' "A Guide To Measuring Advocacy And Policy". The data collection tools included in the handbook have actually ...
Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments » |
Print This Post
Loading ...
Monday, July 21st, 2008
Author: Coffman, Julia
Publisher: Harvard Family Research Project
Publication Date: September 2007
Abstract
Are there shared elements-goals, outcomes, indicators-across different types of advocacy work? Can we create a common vocabulary for the advocacy evaluation field?
The Composite Logic Model ("CLM") and associated materials was developed by Julia Coffman from Harvard Family Research ...
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments » |
Print This Post
Loading ...
Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008
...has just been published by the Campaigning Effectiveness Programme at NCVO
The book, written by Jim Coe and Ruth Mayne, seeks to advance the case that simple and effective monitoring and evaluation can, if implemented well, become a powerful tool for social and political change. It is aimed at campaigners and ...
Posted in New books, Workshops | No Comments » |
Print This Post
Loading ...
(3 votes, average: 4.33 out of 5)