<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workshop: Standards &amp; Practices in Evaluating Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mande.co.uk/2008/coming-events/workshops/workshop-standards-practices-in-evaluating-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mande.co.uk/2008/coming-events/workshops/workshop-standards-practices-in-evaluating-development/</link>
	<description>A news service focusing on developments in monitoring and evaluation methods relevant to development programmes with social development objectives. Managed by Rick Davies, since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:17:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumeet</title>
		<link>http://mande.co.uk/2008/coming-events/workshops/workshop-standards-practices-in-evaluating-development/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mande.co.uk/?p=152#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>Stadards and practices in Evaluating Development. 

In the developing and Under Developed Nations funds and loans for infrastructure development is being widely provided accepted. It has been generally observed that project implementation with longer cycle/period/duration have goals and objectives which are very general and ambigious as &quot;Larger public benefits&quot;. These goals are seems easy to achieve but their evaluation indicators are not specific and a few of the indicators, stand alone cannot make a criteria of objectives being achieved. In the longer run of the project cycle as 5 years or more, the goals seems as not achieved or rather complexed. Thus the development professionals, with wider vision frame indicators before defining a general goal to the project. 

Sumeet Sharma
Social Development Specialist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stadards and practices in Evaluating Development. </p>
<p>In the developing and Under Developed Nations funds and loans for infrastructure development is being widely provided accepted. It has been generally observed that project implementation with longer cycle/period/duration have goals and objectives which are very general and ambigious as &#8220;Larger public benefits&#8221;. These goals are seems easy to achieve but their evaluation indicators are not specific and a few of the indicators, stand alone cannot make a criteria of objectives being achieved. In the longer run of the project cycle as 5 years or more, the goals seems as not achieved or rather complexed. Thus the development professionals, with wider vision frame indicators before defining a general goal to the project. </p>
<p>Sumeet Sharma<br />
Social Development Specialist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

